Introduction to the Scientific Method:
The
 purpose of the Science Club is, understandably, to learn about all 
manner of Scientific “stuff.” What, exactly, do we mean by “Science?” 
Please, tell me what you think before we continue.
What is Science?
I
 HAVE promised to introduce you today to the fairy-land of science - a 
somewhat bold promise, seeing that most of you probably look upon 
science as a bundle of dry facts, while fairy- land is all that is 
beautiful, and full of poetry and imagination. But I thoroughly believe 
myself, and hope to prove to you, that science is full of beautiful 
pictures, of real poetry, and of wonder-working fairies; and what is 
more, I promise you they shall be true fairies, whom you will love just 
as much when you are old and greyheaded as when you are young; for you 
will be able to call them up wherever you wander by land or by sea, 
through meadow or through wood, through water or through air; and though
 they themselves will always remain invisible, yet you will see their 
wonderful poet at work everywhere around you.
~~ Buckley, Arabella B. (2004-05-01). The Fairy-Land of Science (Kindle Locations 5-10). Public Domain Books. Kindle Edition.
As
 it turns out the answer to this question can be rather complex even 
though it seems as if we should be able put our finger on a nice clear 
answer. For example, you might define science by what it is not. For example, you might say that science isn’t a matter of opinion. 
Can you give me an example of an opinion?
As it turns, people can and do perform scientific studies of public opinion called “surveys” or “opinion polls.”
 In the Food Industry, a company might conduct “taste tests” in the hope
 of scientifically discovering which recipe would have the broadest 
appeal. Politicians like to use polls to
 help determine where the voters stand on controversial matters. 
However, not all surveys or polls are performed correctly and are not, 
in fact, scientific owing to these flaws. 
Does anyone know why a survey might not be scientifically valid? 
While
 this lesson isn’t about surveys, two simple areas where a survey can 
create unreliable results would be the application of leading questions or an inadequate sample surveyed.
 For example, if I asked everyone in this room if they liked apples or 
oranges better, I would not have a large enough survey in order to 
generalize a conclusion that “such-and-such a percent of Americans prefer apples to oranges.” A leading question is one that biases responses towards one answer over another. For example, “Company
 X has genetically engineered their cows; but the Scientific Community 
urges caution in the name of public safety. Would you consider eating 
Company X’s mysterious Frankenmeat or do you think the natural thing is 
safer?”
As confusing as this might be, let us start with a working definition of science as the pursuit of knowledge which can be verified.
 An important point regarding science is that the conclusions must be, 
in some way, testable .. either verified or disproved. Science requires 
discipline and rigor. 
What is the Scientific Method?
Although
 commonly presented as a sequence of steps, not all steps are performed 
in every scientific inquiry and when they do occur, it is not always in 
the same order. Our discussion, therefore, should be a general outline, 
not a straight jacket. Basically, what we want is a method of 
understanding and possibly predicting some aspect of our world. This 
method must be based on evidence and observation and needs to be 
reproducible. 
Scientists
 use a series of steps to determine if they can justify a belief in 
something. The basic parts of the scientific method are: Problem, 
Hypothesis, Materials, Procedure, Data, Results, Conclusion. 
Problem
Our
 problem begins as a curiosity regarding something or a need to explain 
and hopefully predict a phenomenon under consideration. Let’s consider 
as an example a caveman, Og, and his wife, Meg.
Og
 goes out to hunt every day to feed his family. Meg busies herself 
everyday in rummaging around the forest looking for roots, tubers, 
berries, nuts, seeds, or leaves for her family to eat. Archeologists 
would consider them a hunter-gather society. Their lifestyle involves a 
lot of effort and quite a bit of wandering about. 
Meg, being a fastidious housewife, noticed that if she just discards the leftovers from their meals about the cave that insects, rats, pests, and other animals tend to accumulate. She decides to pitch the leavings of their meals in one large pile a short distance from their home. Now, she discovers one day, some corn plants growing in the refuse pile.
Meg would like to know why the corn is growing there. She’s curious, because if she understands why corn is growing in the refuse pile, it seems as if she might be able to convince corn to grow somewhere convenient. If so, she might not have to go searching as far to gather corn for her family.
Meg, being a fastidious housewife, noticed that if she just discards the leftovers from their meals about the cave that insects, rats, pests, and other animals tend to accumulate. She decides to pitch the leavings of their meals in one large pile a short distance from their home. Now, she discovers one day, some corn plants growing in the refuse pile.
Meg would like to know why the corn is growing there. She’s curious, because if she understands why corn is growing in the refuse pile, it seems as if she might be able to convince corn to grow somewhere convenient. If so, she might not have to go searching as far to gather corn for her family.
“When
 we want to find out anything that we do not know, there are two ways of
 proceeding. We may either ask somebody else who does know, or read what
 the most learned men have written about it, which is a very good plan 
if anybody happens to be able to answer our question; or else we may 
adopt the other plan, and by arranging an experiment, try for ourselves.
 An experiment is a question which we ask of Nature, who is always ready
 to give a correct answer, provided we ask properly, that is, provided 
we arrange a proper experiment.”
~~ C. V. Boys. Soap-Bubbles / and the Forces Which Mould Them (Kindle Locations 54-58).
Hypothesis
"Why?”
 “Why??” “WHY???” The countless “whyzz” of childhood have tried the 
patience of adults throughout the ages. But asking “why” is one of the 
most important strategies children have for connecting with their 
caregivers and learning about the world around them.
Ever
 get in trouble for asking too many “whys?” Well, science is all about 
asking why and then figuring out the answer for yourself. Questions 
reveal what you don’t know and what you might be willing to put in some 
time and effort in order to learn. Here, questions are good. 
A
 Scientist would look at a problem and speculate or guess at a possible 
explanation. Not all guesses are created equal. We could just make a 
blind guess and start working on testing our theory, but we’d really 
like to save time. We’d like to start with research and reading or 
perhaps asking questions of people who might happen to know. However, 
sometimes it is fun to figure things out for ourselves even if we could just look up the answer. 
Mind,
 I do not advise you to be constantly asking questions of other people; 
for often a question quickly answered is quickly forgotten, but a 
difficulty really hunted down is a triumph for ever. 
For example, if you ask why the rain dries up from the ground, most likely you will be answered, "that the sun dries it," and you will rest satisfied with the sound of the words. But if you hold a wet handkerchief before the fire and see the damp rising out of it, then you have some real idea how moisture may be drawn up by heat from the earth.
For example, if you ask why the rain dries up from the ground, most likely you will be answered, "that the sun dries it," and you will rest satisfied with the sound of the words. But if you hold a wet handkerchief before the fire and see the damp rising out of it, then you have some real idea how moisture may be drawn up by heat from the earth.
~~ Buckley, Arabella B. (2004-05-01). The Fairy-Land of Science (Kindle Locations 128-136). Public Domain Books. Kindle Edition.
For
 example, our cavewoman, Meg, might hear a robin singing in the tree 
nearby and guess that the robin’s song magically draws the corn seed out
 of the ground. Therefore, she could try to imitate the song of the 
robin and by emulating this singing see if corn then grows. This would 
take some time and effort and only serve to frustrate Meg in the long 
run. She might become irritable and give up on trying to understand why 
corn grows. 
But with a little more thinking, Meg can make a well-educated guess. Well researched and well educated guesses make the process of experimentation, trial, and error proceed more quickly. Meg might realize that robins sing perched in branches everywhere, but corn does not grow everywhere.
What hypothesis do you think Meg should make? Why do you think that’s a good hypothesis to start with? What observations should Meg be making that might help her formulate a good hypothesis?
But with a little more thinking, Meg can make a well-educated guess. Well researched and well educated guesses make the process of experimentation, trial, and error proceed more quickly. Meg might realize that robins sing perched in branches everywhere, but corn does not grow everywhere.
What hypothesis do you think Meg should make? Why do you think that’s a good hypothesis to start with? What observations should Meg be making that might help her formulate a good hypothesis?
At this point, we don’t know if the hypothesis is correct or not because we haven’t done any testing. 
Procedure
The
 Scientific method stresses the importance of reproducibility and record
 keeping. You need to specify what you did with enough detail for others
 to repeat your experiment for themselves and see if they get the same 
results. This is, to a large extent, one of the greatest parts about the
 acquisition of knowledge through Science. 
For example, an astronomer called Galileo Galilei got into an argument with the Church over his notion that the sun was the center of the solar system. Quoting some passages in the bible literally, the Church maintained that the earth was the center of the universe. For example, 1 Chronicles 16:30 says "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved" and Psalm 104:5 maintains "the Lord set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." However, because Galileo employed the methodologies of science, his observations could be repeated by others. In time, while the Church could forcibly silence Galileo, they could not suppress his discoveries forever. Other scientists with other telescopes saw the evidence themselves.
A scientific procedure details a series of steps taken to test the hypothesis. Often, scientists must change the procedure several times to get it written down with enough detail. The procedure should probably lists materials used, process followed, and identify the variables present.
For example, an astronomer called Galileo Galilei got into an argument with the Church over his notion that the sun was the center of the solar system. Quoting some passages in the bible literally, the Church maintained that the earth was the center of the universe. For example, 1 Chronicles 16:30 says "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved" and Psalm 104:5 maintains "the Lord set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." However, because Galileo employed the methodologies of science, his observations could be repeated by others. In time, while the Church could forcibly silence Galileo, they could not suppress his discoveries forever. Other scientists with other telescopes saw the evidence themselves.
A scientific procedure details a series of steps taken to test the hypothesis. Often, scientists must change the procedure several times to get it written down with enough detail. The procedure should probably lists materials used, process followed, and identify the variables present.
The scientist identifies: Controls which they keep constant; Independent Variables which they alter for the experiment; and the Dependent Variables that change in response to alterations of the Independent Variable. 
Meg
 wants to know why the corn grows in the refuse pile and how she can get
 it to grow where she would like. Can you identify what might be a 
Control, an Independent Variable, and a Dependant Variable? 
Data
A
 scientist must carefully collect the data without bias or distortion. 
If a scientist isn’t careful, she can make mistakes during this step. 
People have a tendency to want to make sense of the world around them 
and they generally try to support what they think is a good explanation.
 
"Watson
 called this phenomenon the confirmation bias, the tendency to seek out 
and interpret new evidence in ways that confirm what you already think. 
People are quite good at challenging statements made by other people, 
but if it's your belief, then it's your possession -- your child, 
almost-- and you want to protect it, not challenge it and risk losing 
it." 
~~ The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt
~~ The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt
Sometimes,
 a scientist is guilty of having a particular bias or perspective they 
wish to support. That is to say, they “have an axe to grind.” If a 
scientist allows her bias to affect how she collects data, then her 
results will not be reproducible by other scientists who do not share 
her bias. For example, a scientist might work for a company that 
produces aerosol sprays, like hairspray. As his company makes a lot of 
money from selling their product, the company wants results that say 
that their hairspray does not damage the ozone layer. If the scientist’s
 findings do not say what they company wants, the scientist’s job may be
 on the line. This bias prevents collecting accurate data and is not a 
good way to conduct science.  
What sort of data might Meg collect in her experiments to uncover the secrets of agriculture? 
Results
You
 might expect that data, results and conclusions are the same thing, but
 they are distinct. A scientist collects every bit of potentially useful
 data and preserves it so other scientists can review it later. The 
investigating Scientist might find it useful to sort, organize, graph 
the data so it is easier to figure out what the data means. A reviewing 
scientist can examine the data and check the results to see if the 
investigating Scientist has accurately summarized and organized his 
data. This is one of the steps of peer-review and is a means of checking
 for errors that the original scientist may not have seen. 
No
 one is perfect, but it helps an investigating scientist to be detailed 
and diligent if they know their work will be scrutinized by others. 
What do you think Meg’s results might look like? 
Conclusion
The
 conclusion would be what the investigating scientist feels they have 
learned, verified, supported or disproved through their investigation. 
The data could be the measurements you’ve taken; results could be their 
organization and display; but your conclusion would be what they mean. 
You should not be thinking about your conclusion while still collecting 
data because you may develop a bias that affects how accurately you 
collect your data. 
"It
 is a capital mistake to theorize before you have all the evidence. It 
biases the judgment." ~~ Sherlock Holmes, a Study in Scarlet
"It
 is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one 
begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit 
facts." ~~ Sherlock Holmes Quote, A Scandal in Bohemia
A
 scientist should not feel badly about their experiment if their 
hypothesis is proven incorrect or simply not supported by the evidence. 
Sometimes scientists learn more from an incorrect hypothesis than they 
do from a correct one. In any case, a scientist’s conclusion should 
include a possible explanation for the hypothesis being correct or 
incorrect. This may provide direction for a follow-up experiment. 
What
 possible confusion might arise for Meg as she examines her experiment 
and tries to draw conclusions? What future experiments might occur to 
her as a result? 
Definitions of Science:
Science
 (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise 
that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations
 and predictions about the universe.
sci·ence
  /ˈsīəns/ (Noun) - The intellectual and practical activity encompassing
 the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and 
natural...
sci·ence
 [sahy-uhns] (noun) - systematic knowledge of the physical or material 
world gained through observation and experimentation.
Merriam-Webster Science Definition
The
 Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines science as "the state of knowing." 
This can also be taken to mean knowledge as opposed to ignorance or lack
 of understanding.
Another
 science definition offered by Merriam-Webster is that it is knowledge, 
or a system of knowledge that covers general truths or the operation of 
general laws. This is especially the case when this knowledge has been 
acquired through the application of the scientific method.
Oxford Dictionary Science Definition
The
 Oxford Dictionary defines science as an intellectual and practical 
activity that through observation and experiment, involves the 
systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and 
natural world.
"[Science]
 consist of a body of knowledge about the natural world" The facts that 
make up this knowledge are derived from accurate observations and 
experiments. These facts can be checked or verified by anyone through 
replicating and repeating the experiment, and as time goes on scientific
 knowledge steadily progresses.
~~ Sandra Amos and Richard Boohan, authors of "Teaching Science in Secondary Schools"
Science is the process by which humans question, investigate, explore and improve the world around them.
~~ Liz Thompson
~~ Liz Thompson
Science is the identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.
    ~American Heritage Dictionary
Science
 is the process of finding-out. It is the art of interrogating nature, a
 system of inquiry that requires curiosity, intellectual honesty, 
skepticism, tolerance for ambiguity, openness to new ideas and the 
sharing of knowledge.
    ~Roberta H. Barba
Science
 is forming questions about the way things work and trying to answer 
those questions through experimentation and observation. It is having an
 open mind and rejoicing when the outcome is a surprise.
    ~Meryl Rosenblum, Elementary School Teacher
A
 carpenter, a school teacher, and scientist were traveling by train 
through Scotland when they saw a black sheep through the window of the 
train.
"Aha," said the carpenter with a smile, "I see that Scottish sheep are black."
"Hmm," said the school teacher, "You mean that some Scottish sheep are black."
"No,"
 said the scientist glumly, "All we know is that there is at least one 
sheep in Scotland, and that at least one side of that one sheep is 
black."
Definitions of the Scientific Method
Picture
 science being a car driving towards a place called "knowledge." The 
scientific method is like the road map that you follow in order to get 
to that destination.
Let's
 say that I am an archaeologist and that I hypothesize that an ancient 
culture "X" existed based upon a piece of pottery that I had found and I
 further hypothesize various characteristics of this culture. Later it 
is found that I was correct in my hypothesis through continued 
validation from other findings. I then hypothesize that any culture that
 can make such pottery will have a high lead content in their remains. 
Again this is found to be true. These hypotheses have now become 
theories as they have been verified yet they did not follow the 
definition of scientific method nor could they. This is Science.
(An acceptable “Scientific Method” needs to account for the field of study.)
The
 phrase “THE scientific method” may be a bit misleading. Biologists 
study variation in the traits of organisms, and the very methods that 
scientists use to ask and answer questions might be viewed as a variable
 trait. Some scientists do things one way, some another; some emphasize 
experimental tests, some observations, some complex mathematical models.
 But there are fundamental steps in the scientific process that almost 
all scientists use, and those steps are what we highlight as “the 
methodS of science.”
The steps of the scientific method are to:
- Ask a Question
- Do Background Research
- Construct a Hypothesis
- Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
- Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
- Communicate Your Results
The
 scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, 
acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous 
knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on
 empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of 
reasoning.
A
 method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 
17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and 
experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of 
hypotheses.
Oxford English Dictionary
The scientific method has four steps
1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.
2.
 Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the 
hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical 
relation.
3.
 Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or 
to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.
4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.
